Samplescompany Speeches

Why struggle with that fight, how to fight: Reflections for a popular revolution

Every revolution carries in his heart the ideal of democracy, justice and freedom, but the revolution does not always ideal. For opportunists always use impulses and aspirations of the people to change for personal reasons.


The question does not make the finding and idly; The question is say what we do to prevent opportunists seize control of the masses who aspire to true democracy.

Hence the need for a background check goal of all leaders who claim to be revolutionary, to see whether in their past they have already enriched by using the struggles of the masses. We must also see whether in their past they gagged freedom and democracy when they claimed to fight for its values.

must see if at some point in their lives they had attitudes of contempt towards the lives of some of their countrymen, and they were indifferent to the misery of these.

If this is the case it does no good to associate with such individuals to lead any fight, because these are people who themselves do not believe in the cause they claim to defend. These are their personal interests that guide their actions and not any cause.

The revolutionary struggle is first and foremost a gift of oneself to others and not vice versa.

The life story of Jesus tells us that in the Bible shows that he was a revolutionary in the sense that it has agreed to give his life for others, the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) was a revolutionary in the sense that he agreed to go to the front for the victory speech that he wanted to bring to the world, Che Guevara was a revolutionary in the sense that he drop everything to go and give his life for others and for his ideas, never loot public resources or to Cuba or the Congo or Bolivia. Here are some models that have to be revolutionary for us compasses of our action.

A revolution without revolutionaries is a racket and a waste of time because it always brings us back to square one. Therefore everyone must steel themselves to understand that the fight we want to conduct against Gbagbo is above all a gift of self, which requires that individual egos give way to the collective cause and popular. Everyone can leave his life in a revolution, but we must be sure that in leaving his life it is left for a cause just believe that all those with whom we struggle. Do not be wrong to take action to risk our lives for that final few opportunists who are free to use it just for personal use.

Whoever does not understand this does not deserve its place in the momentum of change we want to bring in Côte d'Ivoire. Our action must be foremost in the interest of all the people and not for some of the people or a few individuals that replace the people.

Here the spirit that should guide our future actions.

Yours, militant greetings! The struggle continues - until the final victory!

Pain Moves From Sinus To Jaw

Nikel me it goes .. perfect!

Hello everyone ... just some family news ... and to tell you that here it goes ... nikel impeccable (says someone who imitates Sacha ... ahem)




























































Here I help mom make bredele ... well yes I am a little Alsatian still



















But MY DAD .... it's definitely my hero ...

What Can Reduce Stomach Acid Immediately?

My brother ...










































































Small game 100 as: so .... who is who?
Hint: one who "farts" in the sweater size 18 months is not who you think ...

Do Dvr Recordings Help Ratings

Noah: The Year of Discovery

I crawl at the speed of light (so I'm helping Mom in addition to the household), I am sitting, I eat a cracker all alone as a great short, I grew up really well from what told me!

My Vision Looks Like A Kaleidoscope

Petit Papa Noël ... What a rascal that one

Verbatim
Mom said, "come quickly Sacha see under the tree, Santa Claus has just passed and left plenty of surprises for you and Noah before leaving quickly" Sasha arriving
Current and planting himself in front of the fir fists on hips, "what bin naughty one!"
is true that this is quite a rascal PN

Flower Arrangements For A Baby Shower

spoofing its identity on facebook: Major Doumbia reacts / This scheme will like Hitler is worse than Milosevic spent

Declaration reaction the theft of my identity on Facebook by Gbagbo and his supporters

Dear friend (s), many of you who write to me if my identity theft by individuals who are use propaganda in favor of Gbagbo.
I want to reassure you by telling you just that I am aware of this duplication of my Facebook profile done by the laboratory of PML pro-Gbagbo (pathetic liars).
They cloned my Facebook profile and I find it pathetic on their part.
It's just a pathetic way to use my image for their campaign, after failing in all their attempts to entice me by offering me some money, a shelter and protection. Without me with them, they steal my name and image to poison the Ivorian and reassure their members about to abandon the sinking ship that is the REIT. They know that I am listened to by a majority of the people and I enjoy an indisputable historical legitimacy, because of my principles and rigor that I insist in my stance.
Faced with this usurpation of my identity, all I can do is reassure my family and those who always give me confidence, telling them that I would never argue Laurent Gbagbo, the executioner of the people, broadcaster Automatic hatred, coupled with a plunderer of public resources. For me, supporting Gbagbo is like asking for a Democrat to support Hitler in the darkest days of Nazism.
I'm patient and resolutely committed to fighting for the liberation of the people and the restoration of democracy in Côte d'Ivoire. This scheme will like Hitler rose.
The struggle continues until final victory.

Thank you ..


\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\
thank you, dear friend (s), that our convictions are unwavering, selfless conduct this fight, let us strengthen our sacred union and the acculons into their corner.
Mediocrity never because of the excellence, hatred will never because of the love that we preach, the plundering of resources due to the collective will never share what we want, just as darkness and the darkness will never because of the light. Brothers and sisters, you are the light, shine, enlighten the people, fight the darkness and the darkness that is the REIT for the people of Côte d'Ivoire. With you a new dawn rises over the country.
The struggle continues, the conduct until total victory. This is the victory of good over evil.
S Doumbia Major

\\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\ \\

Doumbia Major explains why the situation in Ivory Coast is different from that of Tunisia.

popular Revolution: Why The Ivory Coast is not comparable to Tunisia

Far from rationality, political parties and structured on tribal basis, by "surfing" on the emotional, as militants hold their hostages, who finally feel that their survival depends on that of their leader . They are ready to defend at the risk of their lives, that it defends the truth or falsehood. Moreover, in these cases roubladise, and breach of promise can be seen as the manifestation of a political genius in the sense of defending the group. Public lies, denials, and the inconstancy of the head does not it alleged, since for the tribal militant action aimed at saving the tribal group is welcome even if it is unworthy or unfair.

This kind of mechanisms that explain the current situation in Côte d'Ivoire, a handful of militants and soldiers, as instruments based on tribal, are ready to defend President Gbagbo, despite the recognition of electoral defeat of the latter by the Independent Electoral Commission and the UN observers. In designing these supporters of Gbagbo, the leader is a tribal leader who is opposed to other tribes. So he orders a tribal militia who considers that his surviving is linked to its leader. That's what this blood pact and unbreakable link that also points to President Gbagbo during a military ceremony distribution of grades. They noted that their destinies are linked, when he told them: "If I fall you fall."

In such a setting where tribal oppositions are both civilians and military, the death of a hundred people from the other side does not move Gbagbo's supporters since those who are killed are not considered nationals or as compatriots, but as threats to their survival. They are animalized and whenever we find circumstances mitigating factors to justify their disposal. The militant tribal is shortsighted, he dramatizes the misfortune happening to him and minimize that of others. He has a vision biased and incomplete.
This explains that contrary to Tunisia where the deaths of 90 people has created a stir at the point of toppling the regime, Côte d'Ivoire, forces loyal to President Gbagbo have killed over 400 people, according the UN estimates, it does not start the diet.
context of Tunisia is different from that of Côte d'Ivoire: in Tunisia an oppressed people has attacked an oppressive regime, Côte d'Ivoire was a people divided on the basis of tribal argument, in which each side believes that its survival depends on the extinction of the other side. Hatred fostered by the politics of identity and numbs each other over the death of all those they regard as adversaries, rather enemies.

Doumbia S. Major
President CPR
Expert automated analysis of political speeches

TEXTOPOL Attached to the team from the University Paris-Est



Source facebook page Doumbia Major

facebook.com / doumbiamajor

Polaris Xtra 10 Suspension Upgrade

Gbagbo, have the same opinion that Hitler and leaders of Nazism: the scientific arguments here!

According

Independent Electoral Commission and the UN acting as certifier, President Laurent Gbagbo has lost the presidential election, as recognized by the normal course covers national and international observers.

Refusing to relinquish power he proclaimed elected president by a constitutional council to orders, abusing his power and in violation of Article 64 of the Electoral Code, was substituted for the Ivorian people for him to choose a president in his place.

Led by African countries, this attempt to force passage is disapproved by the international community, almost in its entirety, condemned Mr. Gbagbo and Ouattara recognizes as the legitimate president of Cote d'Ivoire.

In response to this outcry against the confiscation of power by Laurent Gbagbo, it is resisting against those who ask him to leave office in stirring up public opinion in the eyes of which he wishes to impersonate a resistance that opposes the neo-colonialism, which would defend the independence and national sovereignty. He impersonated a Pan-Africanist or a socialist anti-imperialist.

The proclamation of itself as extending the living symbol of resistance and pan-African anti-imperialist who resists neo-colonization of Africa, is only the manipulation and populist discourse. It is obvious to any observer who knows the Ivory Coast and was able to see firsthand the misconceptions that exist between these incantatory rhetoric and the reality of poverty in which Gbagbo and his supporters abandoning their own countrymen, while he and his clan live in shameless luxury that is far from the life of someone claiming to be a revolutionary serving a popular cause.

The paradoxes found in the statements of Gbagbo, added to the circumstantial nature of the migrant and his speech shows how Gbagbo's speech is a speech variable geometry that fits the circumstances, even support one thing and its opposite.

Indeed, it is ironic that Laurent Gbagbo, who supports domestic political discourse of national preference, and that goes against some of his fellow African immigrants living in Ivory Coast or other cons countrymen portrayed as unclean, is he who at the same time wants to present itself as the defender of the strong African cause against the West, described as colonialist or imperialist.

The character of exploitation and manipulation of speech is obvious. Opportunism speaker's hand because it draws a moving speech to take hostage a certain class of people he uses as a shield in his scheme of usurpation of power, for the purpose of personal enjoyment.

He manages to make people believe he is handling it is fighting along the meaning of their beliefs, the worse it is given a symbolic value in presenting himself as someone who crystallizes the strength of any one race against another, described as exploitative.

By using this discursive strategy, he managed to meet expectations by posing as the voice of an identity discourse circulating pre-existing dominant that structures the self-representations of some African and Afro- descendants who believe they have a revenge to take against the colonial past and slavery in the West.

As much as he manipulates the ultranationalist identity discourse to mobilize membership to his personal cause internally, as he manipulates the Pan-African identity discourse on the external front, contrasting blacks to whites, to serve as allies of the first cities in its strategy of confiscation of undemocratic power.

The objective is that they put pressure on Western opinion by interpreting any reaction as interference of imperialists and white slavery in African affairs, which will result in inhibiting any possibility of reaction of Western powers against the dictatorial regime that wants to impose on the Ivorian people.

Doumbia Major

Expert in automated analysis of political speeches

TEXTOPOL Attached to the team from the University Paris 12

Samsung Tv Has Fuzzy Image

The 35-hour zombie

The 35 hours are the zombies of the economic discussion in France: we can do nothing against them. Any rational economic discourse that seeks to clarify their effects on the price competitiveness of French companies is destined to fail miserably.

immediately killed, they ressurgissents, rising from among the dead and misconception, the better to render impossible any analysis and lead to aberrant policies. The zombie of time is called Manuel Valls, following a zombie near the opposite camp. Do not doubt that the year 2012 will see a mass invasion of zombies in the presidential political campaign. After all, the zombie-in-chief of 2007 won. The most

of newspapers recalled that the law as it was passed between 1998 and 2000 has been deprived of most of its substance. In particular, Bertrand Act of 2008 removed any legal constraint in the actual number of hours worked. But this is not enough, obviously. The zombie does not die.

I doubt that the zombie expires more if we examine the actual effects on the labor cost of 35 hours, even if that is the core of his argument. But I'll try.

The Zombie explains, in fact, that France has lost competitiveness due to 35 hours: employee costs too much, in his idleness legalized.

Except that it is not. The low cost of labor has increased in France between 2000 and 2008 (thus before the establishment of the TEPA). It has risen less than the average European country. Infinitely less than in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe, in full catch-up. Less than in all European countries which are facing serious problems of competitiveness due to the explosion of costs (Spain, Greece). In fact, apart from Italy, where labor productivity has stagnated during the period, only Germany and Austria have seen their labor costs increase less than in France (leading to what the average euro area is low). And that because these two countries have chosen a policy of wage deflation. Suicidal policy, which destabilizes the euro area by producing massive trade imbalances, which also was ineffective, since Germany had the third rate increase lowest in developed countries during the period.

If broader, looking at all the developed countries, this time taking into account changes in productivity work, we see again that the evolution of unit labor cost in France was not exceptional. It is lower than the average for OECD countries.

Again, it was Germany (and Japan) that really make exception, experiencing a decline in their unit labor costs: higher wages are lower than was the increase in worker productivity. And the least we can say is that wage deflation has not had the intended effects, after Italy and Portugal, Japan and Germany are the developed countries who had the fastest growth rate low between 2000 and 2007.

It is not by lowering wages that remain competitive with Asian countries: Germany, it strives in vain. The evolution of the euro exchange rate more than offset the decline in unit labor costs in Germany vis-à-vis countries outside the eurozone. His policy of deflation has therefore established a policy of non-cooperative, which has generated trade surpluses mainly vis-à-vis the only countries that share the same currency as Germany, which can not devalue. Without even allow Germany to experience sustained economic growth. The problem is

therefore not the evolution of labor costs in France, which is quite average. It is the evolution in Germany. Because we can not generalize German politics: it can not function-as long as it works-if other European countries do not lead. If all the leads, it leads to widespread deflation of the European economy, lack of aggregate demand. The choice is not between 35 hours and leave the eurozone. But between German politics and the death of deflation in the euro area.

To put it differently, it's time to talk seriously, responsible adult, Germany, because it is in the future of the euro area. And it is not in the economic debate infantilizing French, which resemble the zombie again and again the 35 hours we will succeed.

Is It Ok To Wrestle With Friends In Underwear

Interview / Debate radio plume on the Ivorian crisis: Doumbia Major explains clearly the Ivorian crisis and highlights the manipulative maneuvers underlying

Understanding Ivorian crisis: one country, two chairs, which side is the legitimacy?

Doumbia Major, political activist, writer and expert in political communication has been the December 28, 2010, the guest of the radio plume.

Theme: Laurent Gbagbo and the strategy of scavenger how Laurent Gbagbo manipulates nationalism and Pan-Africanism as a strategy of conquest and usurpation of power.

The guest of the day flew debate by clearly explaining the legitimacy crisis that saw the Ivory Coast. C ike usual he has informed the national and international opinion on the discursive strategy of Laurent Gbagbo.

Document except to listen absolutely.

To download this audio Click here

Whats Kates Playground Real Name

Doumbia Major dissects the speech by Gbagbo and the FPI in an unpublished paper to listen to absolutely .

This audio document that remains relevant, shows how Doumbia Major has removed all the arguments Gbagbo's campaign and the galaxy patriotic.

This document very instructive restored historical truths on crisis student on the strategy-making power to Gbagbo and the real causes of the rebellion in September 2002.
This interview, which lends itself Doumbia Major who answered question Mamadou Duma of the newspaper "expression", is also presented as a real deep psychological analysis of Laurent Gbagbo.

Whoever wants to understand the Ivorian crisis, and know the FPI of Laurent Gbagbo, this document should absolutely listen

Listen to the interview in full

To download the document Click here

Bronchitis & Tessalon Pearles

Truth on the Ivorian crisis : Doumbia Major denounced the "politics of scavenger" Laurent Gbagbo (Video) Interview


Ivorian Crisis: Doumbia Major denounces politics Gbagbo
sent cprccom . - Watch the latest videos of news.

How To Clean White Resin Watch

Doumbia Major / The candidate I supported has decided to establish a minimum income

Interview Doumbia Major / The candidate I support has decided to establish a minimum income Revenue from exile in favor of presidential elections Ivory Coast, Doumbia Major, former national secretary for the organization of the Fesci (Student Federation of Cote d'Ivoire), talks about her relationship with Ble Goude, his exile, abuse of which he was the subject of suspected or manipulation of the presidential camp and his choice in the second round between Laurent Gbagbo and Alassane Ouattara. Former secretary of the organization under Fesci Ble Goude, your reports will then turn to vinegar. More than eight years later, it was really past? must say there is no personal relationship between Ble Goude and me. Ble Goude is a brother to me, because we know from the city of Yopougon. We worked together and therefore we remain for me anyway, brothers. What happened is that between Wheat and me there is a divergence of view on the role played by the Fesci in the political arena. For us the issue was not to involve the student movement in the political wrangling by siding with any political party. This was not the case that Ble Goude wished to engage the side Fesci FPI (Ivorian Popular Front). And so we did not agree on this issue. We made him understand that having a base composite and plural, it was not possible nor desirable that the movement is committed to supporting the FPI. And therefore this position of neutrality that we desired was seen as a refusal to accept the grip of FPI on the student movement, which won the FPI supporters unite with Wheat to quell the students who defended our position. There was during this action Ble Goude helped by the FPI, seconded by the army against our friends, there was I said the dead. The modus operandi was known. The soldiers close to the FPI and supporting Ble Goude, who were disarmed after our comrades were slashed with machetes by relatives of the FPI. Here is the strategy used by FPI officials to dislodge our fellow student residences. There has been during these operations, several dead. Including fellow Bakayoko Memissa, the city Vridi, peers Kouassi Herve, the city of Williamsville, Comrade Kignelman to the City of Mermoz, who was slashed. Supported by the army, militants have murdered after FPI having brutally slashed. I can quote the same lines the case of our fellow Moudoulaye Kone who was killed in Abobo by people close to Ble Goude, who have entrenched gender. Even when I am gone into exile to avoid the burning of the university, the killings have continued with the death of Habib Dodo. And those who engage in these practices there, we continued to share even in their own rank in which they are sometimes killed by machete. The continuation of these practices in their own order clearly shows that people have introduced the use of the machete at the university. Our position which was a position of neutrality is to fight the alliance between the party and wheat Goudé Laurent Gbagbo, with machetes and using armed men in the pay of the REIT. In this action Laurent Gbagbo was personally involved alongside Ble Goude against me, stating publicly that my intention was to make a coup and that I was manipulated by the RDR, whereas it was not. Here's what happened and to avoid having more deaths in dormitories on the part of persons protected by the army, engaged cowardly murder of his unarmed students, we decided to make a tactical withdrawal by taking the path of exile. It was not a voluntary exile, an exile that was to preserve our lives and the lives of our comrades who have become internal exiles in Côte d'Ivoire. That reality has led us into exile, is a matter of disagreement on what was supposed to be the action of a union. These are positions and obviously the time has proved us right, since today we see that the structure is subservient Fesci ruling FPI and helps rather the power to impose its decisions on students. The Fesci of Tomorrow's energy structure has become a mafia racketeers engaged in their little schemes and bargaining on campus and dormitories, benefiting from protection and indulgence of power back they organized as a militia supporting the power against opponents to the plans, because the survival of their business is related that the regime of Laurent Gbagbo. This is unfortunate because the Fesci has lost its raison d'etre was to fight to defend the interests of some students which plan was in front of her. It is this situation that I wanted to avoid advocating refusal to support the movement to a political party. Then you go into exile, is said to continue your studies. In the same vein you created a political party that is the CPR. What were the highlights of this exile? I did not go into exile to continue my studies. I went there to protect my physical integrity. To the extent that the country had become unlivable for us. We could not continue to go about our business school where individuals protected by the government engaged in criminal acts. These people here are known, they enjoyed total impunity and continue to benefit. Housed behind the army, they engage and continue to engage in such acts. I think some of them are now pinned by the international community as persons subject to prosecution and, therefore, sooner or later these individuals will be brought to the International Criminal Court. When I found myself in exile, my vocation at the University of Abidjan is to continue my studies, I decided to continue my training in France. That's how I registered in France where I did two masters at the University Paris 12 and I registered for a doctoral degree in automated analysis of discourse. I am a Master Project Manager and Development and a master's degree in political communication and public. I also had time to write, I wrote a book entitled "The manifesto for Africa today which is read around the world, work that stands Library of Congress of the United States. You will also find in the library of New York and in the best universities in the world, not to mention the national library of France, Germany and Toronto, Canada. For now, it is censored in Côte d'Ivoire, but it is a reference book for anyone who wants to study the sociological phenomena related to development policy in Africa. I'm still interested in the lives of my countrymen, despite being in exile. I have always been committed and it is this commitment that led me to support the insurgent action of September 19 some time after its triggering. We supported the rebellion to show people that those who claimed to be victims were not victims. In reality they are the killers and they are the ones who created the war. Because these people there, people were tortured here in Cote d'Ivoire. Before there was Sept. 19, there was the before 19 September. We can not talk about Sept. 19 not to mention the causes of September 19. The causes of 19 September, for example, the indifference in which I was tortured at school gendarmerie where I suffered "torment ants magnans" I had put in magnans private parts. I was tortured and put in tires where there were nests magnans, I was locked up in rooms where they had pumped tear gas. I was beaten and disfigured because of my views. When you exit the torture like that even when they laugh at you after these atrocities, and those whom we are done with impunity, that is situations that are intolerable. The preliminary September 19, is also the situation of women who were raped in the police academy, then they only wanted to walk. In the case of rape documented, when asked the question to Mrs. Gbagbo to know what she thought, she said what they are picked up there. Question to say that it mad. Yet rape is classified as crimes. So indifference and impunity from such practices that brought the insurrection of September 19, 2002. Akouédo to where we were even arrested, tortured and kept, there have been cases of soldiers who were tortured because of their name, some were put in rows of barbed wire and beaten. Some have been killed here with the support and complicity of newspapers including the newspaper "Our Way" which was preparing the psychological ground for the acceptance of all these crimes. These are all frustrated forced into exile who left the country and said no, this must stop. Do not forget we are humans and we still have the right to live freely in our countries. We can not force us into exile, can not humiliate us in our own country and ask us not to react. These are all frustrated, all humiliated, tortured and all the parents of all these deaths of charnel Yopougon, who were denied the right to life, who rose up against the illegitimate regime of Laurent Gbagbo. Do not forget they have the right to insurrection. This right is a right recognized by the United Nations. When a people is part of the population is frustrated or unjustly martyred, the people there, has the right to raise. The uprising of 19 September was an uprising martyrs. We say that the war itself is not good and should not create the conditions for its occurrence. Because those who died, those who were tortured before Sept. 19, are also human. Those who have caused so acts preparatory to September 19, are the real perpetrators of the act of September 19. Why seek the sponsors of the rebellion elsewhere? Ouattara is a victim like us! We can not wait for us Ouattara insurrection! The revolt is personal! It's not Ouattara to tell which that is pissed off. Ouattara took to the grave of his mother open. He suffered all the humiliations, we saw that people went to get his elderly mother in Marcory asking if her son was really her son. There is only one victim among many others. It's not Ouattara who asked anyone to rebel, we must seek the origin of the revolt of September 19th for those who have created the conditions. We who have supported this rebellion, have supported the rebellion of humans against those who would treat them as subhuman in their own country. We did not support an individual, we supported the struggle a people that wants to support themselves, live in freedom and respect. You support the armed rebellion, and yet you scold the policies of President Laurent Gbagbo. Doumbia Major is he himself a role model? I was spokesman for the rebel army. It is true that I was not on the field, it's true that I have condemned abuses by the rebels, because I am by nature advocate certain values. And therefore I can not defend these values, and even if they endorse caused by my relatives. I always condemned the excesses of the rebellion, but I supported the uprising of citizens to assert their right to live at home. I have always defended the unity of the nation. For us, national unity is sacred because it builds the nation. We can not accept that divides the Ivorian passing or treating some citizens as subhuman. That is the meaning of my act. It is an act to go to peace. To say that some of the people should not be imposed on another by force. We want peace in which everyone is respected. Because we want the resources that belong to all Ivorians are redistributed fairly and that no person manipulates by playing some of the people against another. We want a redistribution of resources and we want a different kind, not the current one, which is an order of looting. We are not trying to be a model. These are people who will say after whether or not you were a model. But until then, that I know, I've never been involved in acts of stealing, or in looting of public funds or looting of property resources. I've always distanced itself from such practices. You know me since I am a student, I still had principles. I always follow my convictions and I have never taken people. So I always defend the beliefs that are mine. And when the people's interest in a matter, I forbid it. I do not procrastinate on this. I have ideas, not people. If people change, I leave them in their change and I continued my way. If that be a model, I agree to be. But for me the main thing is to act. I always say that the current regime, the regime FPI is not good for Côte d'Ivoire. Because it is a regime that is against all the freedoms and public rights. You see, Today, there are no parties in which FPI has put his hand to try to break out. So the FPI itself is a dangerous regime to democracy. We also saw the FPI in order for ten years. During all these years, resources have been pillaged. With an annual budget of 2.5 trillion, the FPI has been able to improve the living conditions of citizens. No social housing has been built in Ivory Coast in a decade. Yet in his time Houphouet did! The Sicogif the SOGEFIHA we see today are his works. He at least, despite all that he can be criticized, He understood that citizens of his country have the right to housing, which is not the case FPI claiming to be a socialist party. Gbagbo himself has benefited from the French welfare, then her child was born and received allocations from the French people, but he refuses to admit that the Ivorian citizens who do not work independently of their will, have the right to life. Gbagbo has established no minimum income for the unemployed who are engaged in begging, yet he claims to socialism. Even liberal gave Houphouet was at that time a living wage for that hooligans called the VS. The amount was 20,000 francs in his time he did it because these people were not working but they had the right to live in their country. But the FPI, the Socialist Party who sees clearly that some citizens do not work, could not even reach 5% or 10% of the national budget to allocate their income as vital to respect the right to life . The right to life is not respected by those who call themselves socialists. You see, Gbagbo and his supporters claim to nationalist, but it's surprising that people who claim to native son are not the same solidarity vis-à-vis their compatriots who live in poverty. They die of hunger, they leave them sleeping in the slums that designates Sicobois, while these compatriots are entitled to housing. I think those who are indifferent to the misery of their fellow citizens can not claim to be socialist even less about nationalism. Because the first act of a nationalist, is solidarity. We can not afford to be nationalistic and privileges as our compatriots languishing in poverty. The first nationalist is one who respects the lives of its citizens. Gbagbo and the FPI are only conglomerate populist manipulator who uses nationalist rhetoric to mobilize the membership of the ignorant. Someone who has been facing a rebellion and that he did not hesitate to plunder the resources, what will happen when he has a free hand? The FPI has done nothing for Côte d'Ivoire. They say he has done for rural electrification, but me it makes me laugh. Rural electrification is a scheme which was introduced by the government since Houphouet Boigny. The system is designed so that the more the company yad'abonnés Ivorian electricity (ICE), the more opportunities to electrify the villages. And that is inscribed on the bills, because they are citizens who pay taxes for rural electrification. I'm shocked that Gbagbo says he has electrified more villages than others. This is not him who set the algorithm of this scheme. Ivory Coast is the people who electrified the villages. Where the problem lies is that electrified villages where there are fewer people and on a tribal basis, instead of making the number of inhabitants per village. When Gbagbo makes us believe that he wanted to establish AMU (Universal Health Insurance), a pale copy of the CMU French. I laugh in so far as to establish the AMU, he must begin by addressing. When you do not take a law to address that identifies each citizen and the link to an address and a biometric identifier to be, and you make an identification count as they have done, you can say that you want to set up a AMU. Hell is paved with good intentions they say! Gbagbo has never wanted to set up the AMU, then that intent begins with the first law. We have not yet seen this legislation addressing. Second thing, AMU starts with the banking services which are made by the bank repayments. When you do not take a law of banking services required, you can not therefore say that you wanted to implement this program. This is not war which forbids you to take a law. Only populism, it is only propaganda. We say that the debate debate cons, cons Action Action, no match. We say that we got to take active part in political debate. I think it's Ble Goude who is their campaign manager, and we find ourselves before we discuss People of all these issues, and we will demonstrate that they have the worst of candidates. They have a candidate who defends the poor. For our part, compared to the resources of the FPI, we can say we're not poor. We have always worked to get our diplomas. We did not hide behind false privileges to play the hero. Come before the people, come in a transparent and we explain, without weapons or violence and you will see. We came in Ivory Coast to call for change, we call for change, because we believe that the dog does not change its way of sitting. Those who want a change for Côte d'Ivoire, all these young people without jobs who want a minimum wage, must choose my candidate. Gbagbo said he would create 80,000 jobs. But when you multiply that number by five, what will happen about the other workers when it knows they are the number of 4 million. While I support the candidate that has decided to establish a minimum income. That is to say that he respects the right to life of the Ivorians. We came to enlighten the Ivorians so they are not handled and we will break the logic of manipulative Mrs. Gbagbo opposing religions pretending that we are in a Jubilee year. Should not climb the Christians against Muslims. Côte d'Ivoire that we defend it from the Côte d'Ivoire brews, like that of interbreeding is the child of Laurent Gbagbo, Michel, who is half white. The Coast Ivory is the Ivory Coast where the values of expertise come together to address the real challenges are those of employment, the challenges facing the disease, the challenges of the pension issue, the challenges of right to life, the challenges of housing. We say the people that if we support a candidate, not a blind support is blind support. C'es to say that we will be the watchmen who will ensure that the interests of the Ivorian people are safeguarded. I ask young people from Ivory Coast to trust us because our choice is the right choice that will bring the change we all seek. Made before the presidential election by Aymar Dedi - a journalist for the intelligent d'Abidjan Photo caption: Doumbia Major support the candidate of the RHDP, candidate of change

Lipo 3.7v 400mah Current

Laurent Gbagbo has lost the election, we must not move the problem.

Dear sir, between activists we have to be told the truth: Laurent Gbagbo has lost the election, it is also clear that 2 +2 makes 4 is mathematical. The poor, he cancel his friend Yao Ndre the results of 7 regions of the country that are unfavorable to obtain only 51% of the vote.

Ndre Yao, the former campaign director Laurent Gbagbo for the region of Divo has been hard, but he got there all the same. But this he forgets is that even if he wanted to help his friend as a good obedient servant, he should have read the law in this area, since no article of the electoral law does say you can cancel a final the results of 7 regions. At the limit we can undo the results of polls that are problematic, but not an entire region.

In this case, some speak of irregularities in the north, do not take people for remained: for a fixed electorate, the list is finally established and validated, we can not fill the ballot boxes and covered the place of those who were supposed to come out and vote.

If that were true, it would mean that supporters of Ouattara's supporters knew all Gbagbo in advance and that they would all stop voting. What is wrong, because despite the evidence produced and assembled to believe this, no death was lamented in the north at the polls. Funny violence, not lamented dead, unless it had been mere intimidation!

also reports of the prefects of the region are clear: "there were no acts of violence different from the ordinary in the election. "This report is corroborated by police reports of UN forces, including individual Commissioners are still not in league with Ouattara, Gbagbo's FPI cons!

Apart associations mounted any papers to denigrate the election, all the structures of observations credible and recognized as having a history in observing elections, have recognized that the election went well.

Yao Ndre n ' no law says he made a wrong interpretation of law in favor of a despot who wanted to legitimize a coup Constitutionally, it's as simple as that. When a country's institutions are run by gangsters who shot to twist the law, they must be fought. The law is sacred when it is true and correct, but do not sanctify the misreading of the law by thugs in ties, the likes of Paul Yao NDRE. If Mr. Ndre had meant the law, it would apply Article 64 of the Ivorian electoral code, revised in 2008, which provides that if the Council finds serious irregularities such as to vitiate the fairness of the vote and to affect the overall result, "he pronounced" the cancellation presidential election (and not give the identity of the winner), a new poll must be held "at least forty-five days" after the date of this decision. Here is the only legal option that was offered to Mr. Yao Ndre. Nowhere is it written that it can cancel the poll in the regions, to declare a winner by excluding areas that are the subject of litigation.

short, knowing the scores of ADO in the area affected by the motion of Mr. Gbagbo, even if it takes 100 times the elections in these regions, there will always score similar to those of the first round. Coincidentally, Mr Gbagbo has not yet challenged the results in the first round, unless it has the surprise. Mr. Ouattara said in these regions has sometimes scores approaching 90% (which is not different from those of the second round contest that Gbagbo sheer bad faith).

Do not want to take people bladders for lanterns, nobody is fooled.

The United Nations has certified the election that everyone knows the results declared by the constitutional council. Apart from some marginal groups, all mankind reasonable asked Gbagbo from power with dignity in the light of these results, we must let him go.

Attempts are made to believe that the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC), whose members were assaulted by thugs representing the REIT, has not announced the results on time. In response, it should be noted that all mankind has seen Damana adia Pickas Medard said, assaulted the spokesman of the CIS, in the presence of international media, to prevent test results. (Coincidentally the media archives, we can see that a few months before, the same is Damana Pickas who hosted the meeting of Yao Induction Ndre by Marcel Gossio, as campaign manager for the region of Gbagbo DIVO).

This masquerade for handing over to Mr. Ndre was a premeditated and carefully orchestrated plan. For the record, I remind you that Damana médard said Pickas, former president of the youth of the REIT, which in 2000 is planning a conspiracy to accuse any part of an assassination attempt on his person, the militant student that I was. Following the plot artificially assembled, I was tortured by the army, I had "ants on Suplice magnans in the slip, this presence of Ble Goude and other dignitaries of the REIT. This means that we are familiar with the maneuvers of this sinister figure, has mastered the art of making the plots.

It is clear that Gbagbo has lost the election, is indisputable and elsewhere, this explains the change in the communication strategy of Gbagbo himself who is assisted in this by network and service communication, sprinkled banknotes.

The new strategy is to try to move the problem on the ground in the fight against the West or that of Pan-Africanist struggle to impersonate a victim of international conspiracy against his person. This is the strategy of the screen of smoke, which is to move one problem by creating another, to ward concerned the primary concern.

Gbagbo wants to look away from his defeat by transposing the problem in the field of conflict between Africa and the West described as neo-colonialist or imperialist.

is a way for him to mobilize the membership of African or West ideological confrontation of nostalgic anti-capitalist or anti-imperialist. He actually wants to use these activists as a shield to hide his dismal electoral debacle in order to confiscate power with the support of some intellectuals naive, who do not know that internally Gbagbo is the man who pushes his supporters at a visceral hatred against Africans and against international workers living in Cote d 'Ivoire. These African and foreign workers who are being harassed and taken xenophobia ("we are so xenophobic?) By Gbagbo's supporters want to live their work. In Côte d'Ivoire Laurent Gbagbo's speech and his supporters is similar to Speech French National Front, these are ultra-nationalists who advocated a fascist speech. Panaficanistes and the leftists who support Gbagbo does not know who he really is. The reality is that Gbagbo is a fake nationalist, leftist activist false, false pan-Africanist who, helped by a clique of predators, has plundered the country's economy, leaving the impoverished masses in abject incommensurate .

Gbagbo is simply a populist modern times, who also conniving with his friends capitalist internationalists such as the French Bouygues, Bolloré, the American Carguil the Israeli, Chinese, etc.. Besides, he just recently signed with French Total a market of more than 200 billion CFA franc. Basically, Gbagbo knows the system he plays in between the capitalist groups to each other.

The anti-imperialist or colonialist Gbagbo and his supporters is simply a manipulation strategy, which aims to mobilize the membership of the idealists and the Africans who think they hate to take revenge against the colonial past of some Western countries. Do not we say that the best way is to manipulate someone make him believe that his interests and ours are alike!

We affirm that we are left we are internationalist and fighting the hideous aspects of capitalism. As men left, we have always questioned the candidate Ouattara on crucial social dimension of the application of liberalism in Africa. Today Mr Ouattara is a man who claims to listen to a liberalism with a human face. Which means it has embarked on a path of social liberalism, knowing that the air combat opposing ideological blocks is exceeded, in a context of globalization economy, which leaves no room for narrow nationalism. President Ouattara has adopted in its program Creating an SMR (living wage) for the Ivorians who do not work independently of their will, what did not Gbagbo, whose clan is enriched while the poor people died penniless minimum loss, or crisis of employment.

Dear brothers and sisters, comrades, so get out of the pathos and nostalgia; Gbagbo has lost this election. You simply have the courage to tell her militant, should not it moves the debate on ideological grounds for hope manipulate anyone. This strategy is too easy and nobody is fooled.

Doumbia Major

political activist

President of CPR (Pan-African Congress for Renewal)

Author of "manifesto for Africa".

Disturb Tv Remote Control

Restore Democracy in Cote d'Ivoire Alassane Ouattara on his election as president. Play

U300 Ac Adapter Nordic Track Hook Up

the last press conference hosted by President Doumbia Major CPR in Abidjan


conf_doumbia_abidjan
sent cprccom . - The Info Live Video.

Keraine Treatment Ottawa

Doumbia S. Major (CPR President and Ex-Member of the CSCF): "Ble Goude is a false hero"

Doumbia Major, is an Ivorian politician, author of the book, "The manifesto for Africa".

President of CPR (Pan-African Congress for Renewal), is to lead a political coalition called ARC (Alternative for Change Republican) who supported the election of the candidate for whom he Ouattara called for the vote second round of the presidential election.

political activist, who was exiled since October 2000, following the disputed election and "calamitous" of Laurent Gbagbo, Doumbia S. Major is a former national secretary of the powerful student union in Côte d'Ivoire (FESCI). In 2000 he was the leader and spokesman for the dissident fringe FESCI, which opposed the pro-Gbagbo faction, led by Charles Ble Goude, who was appointed Minister of Youth and Employment Government world challenged by Laurent Gbagbo.

Imprisoned several times for his views and tortured by the regime and supporters of former President Gbagbo went into exile since 2000, Doumbia Major remained an opponent of the Gbagbo regime which he has always challenged the legitimacy.

a result of a conspiracy mounted against him by Damana Adia said Medard pick (The Partisan Gbagbo has prevented the public spokesperson for the IEC to announce the results of the presidential election), Doumbia Major after being tortured, was detained unjustly in prison Military Agban. But long before this arrest, which supported the FPI Ble Goude cons Doumbia Major had already been arrested several times. Which will in turn stay in the military prison Akuedo, the prison of the police academy, the cells of the Brigade of research, Agban military prison, the prison's school police, and the higher command of Mounted Police where he was tortured in the presence of dignitaries of the regime REIT).

Former Spokesperson for Europe and for France-New Forces of Côte d'Ivoire, Doumbia Major is a specialist in automated analysis of political speeches. Marketing communications consultant and policy, he is the Director of the Company Phoenix Group International.

Special Adviser in charge of strategy, mobilization and organization of candidate RHDP, Anak, Doumbia Major put his expertise to the Ouattara candidate in the second round of the presidential election, where he organized and conducted public meetings, press conferences, leafleting and has given several interviews to support the election of its candidate was elected with a score of 54% .
Doumbia Major is also a writer. He is the author of the book "the manifesto for Africa: Why Africa suffers black t-il", published by the harmattan. He graduated from the University Paris 12, with the rank of Master in Public Policy and Communications, which specializes in automated analysis of political speeches, and a Masters in Engineering Project Manager with the title of project development.

As part of its work in research teams and Textopol Ceditec Paris 12, he worked on the topic "Experimental Study lexicometric reference to the concept of national identity in political discourse in Cote d ' Ivory: contrastive analysis of its variations and its circulation in three political speakers (Gbagbo Bedie-ADO).

Doumbia Major returns to Ivory Coast where he held rallies, public meetings, interviews and press conference to lend its support Alassane Ouattara, who committed to developing in Ivory Coast an SMR (living wage), which is a point of the RPC project, and considered as evidence of compliance with the right to life of citizens by the state.

Having escaped a physical removal from the death squads Pro-Gbagbo, who ransacked his family home nightly to his absence, Doumbia Major is smuggled out of the country, while the borders were closed. Happened in France recently, according to the commitment it made to the Ivorian nation to protect the vote of its activists and the Ivorian citizens, it travels the shelves and organize meetings to explain to the world the legitimacy of the election of President Ouattara, while removing the strategy of victimhood discourse of Laurent Gbagbo, who present themselves as a victim of international conspiracy, when in reality This regime has lost the election beyond any doubt, have long turned into a hate nationalism.

The communication unit of the President of the CPR Doumbia Major

The press officer